<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blip Bloop &#187; defaults</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blipbloop.net/tag/defaults/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blipbloop.net</link>
	<description>By Zach Hale</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:00:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Should I choose RSS or Atom?</title>
		<link>http://blipbloop.net/2008/10/should-i-choose-rss-or-atom/</link>
		<comments>http://blipbloop.net/2008/10/should-i-choose-rss-or-atom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zachhale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defaults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tarsi.dev/bb/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who cares? I don&#8217;t. I bet if I asked everyone I had contact info for, only a few would prefer one or the other (though hopefully one in particular).

Why do sites like Flickr still offer both as an option? I consider myself more knowledgeable than most on the matter simply because I know what the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who cares? I don&#8217;t. I bet if I asked everyone I had contact info for, only a few would prefer one or the other (though hopefully one in particular).</p>

<p>Why do sites like Flickr still offer both as an option? I consider myself more knowledgeable than most on the matter simply because I know what the two <em>represent</em>, let alone what the technical differences are. And that being so, it makes no sense to put both standards (if not different <em>versions</em> of each) in the auto-discovery tags, especially for big sites like Flickr and consumer blogging software like WordPress. Only a rare developer building an application <em>might</em> care, and even in that relatively rare case I could reasonably assume they would be willing to read some developer docs. For the rest of us, our feed readers could care less. So please stop confusing us.</p>

<p>This seems like a dying issue. And then I see it on sites like <em>Flickr!</em> Tisk tisk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blipbloop.net/2008/10/should-i-choose-rss-or-atom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
